- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- WAR ROOM -
STUDY - MORAL
ISSUES - KING
JAMES BIBLE - CULTS
Chuck Baldwin has received the imprimatur from thousands of Bible believers around the USA. He has taken up the conservative political cause and made it part of his pulpit rhetoric as a pastor of a local church.
When I tell other Bible believers that I have no respect for the man, they look at me like a traitor. I will give you my reasons for my observation:
Baldwin says we failed to attack Caesar and the political system with enough zeal, so we have the mess we are in because we are traitors to America. He does not say this in exactly the words I have used, but if you want to see what I mean, go to his articles on New With Views, and read a few articles. You will learn (according to Baldwin) that YOU are the wicked lazy slob who brought about the vile mess we have in our US Government.
By this logic, Jesus was responsible for the extreme murderous puppet government of King Herod in Israel because he made no effort to resist Herod's evil. And, Paul, and the early Church, were responsible for the depraved and wicked government system of the Roman Empire in their day because they did not try to overthrow it. Paul had connections right into Caesar's palace:
1:12 (KJV) But I would ye should understand, brethren, that the things which happened
unto me have fallen out rather unto the furtherance of the gospel;
13 So that my bonds in Christ are manifest in all the palace, and in all other places;
Philippians 4:22 (KJV) All the saints salute you, chiefly they that are of Caesar's household.
With those connections, Paul made NO effort to inform the churches what treachery was going on in high places, nor did he use his connections to try to reform the Roman Empire or stop abortion in Rome. Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin would have been rebuked soundly by the Apostle Paul if they had lived in his day.
I want you to read ALL of the following article. THE TRUTH ABOUT ABORTION, by Chuck Baldwin. You will finally get to the part where Baldwin says the following....
"Where were the tens of thousands of "pro-life" pastors and Christians?
And, yet, these same "pro-life" pastors, church members, and "conservatives" refused to support Congressman Paul for President in 2008, because he was not "conservative" enough."
THAT IS A DAMNED LIE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ron Paul is NOT a Conservative, he is a Libertarian, and he ran on the Libertarian ticket. Bible believers who are savvy know that Ron Paul is a Libertarian. Some of us have done our homework, Herr Baldwin, and we know what Libertarians stand for.
They also stand for freedom to open porn stores, and they stand for freedom of abortion. Not all of course, but there are so many variations of Libertarianism that it has to be considered a damned to hell God hating philosophy hatched by hell bound atheists.
Here is the insane logic of Libertarians as to abortion:
Any defensive argument for the right of women to abort any unwanted pregnancy, whether derived from consensual intercourse or violation, or even if circumstances change or initial consent is withdrawn, must not be based in the tenuous legal concept of a woman's right to privacy, as it currently does. Rather, a woman's right to an abortion should have been grounded from the start in her inalienable human right of self-defense as a human being against unwanted aggressions, intrusions and violations of her person.
This is a right shared by both men and women, and forms the basis of other universal rights that first undermined and then defeated 'official' slavery and tyranny (and maybe, the unofficial kinds, like taxation, to come later).
Abortion is legitimate not because a women's body is her own and a fetus is not really a human being anyway, but because a woman's body is her own and abortion of an unwanted fetus falls under her legitimate right to defend her person from unwanted violations of her body.
Did you get the point? It is not the rapist issue, nor is it the inconvenience. This rather formal discussion of abortion rights by a Libertarian says that the unborn baby is attacking the woman. Read that again please.
The above above writer would be a supporter of Ron Paul if he were elected President.
We had a fellow try to open a porn store in Barstow, California back in the 1970s while I pastored nearby. We, and the business people of Barstow, fought it, and God delivered the city of the thing by a clause in its 1938 city charter. But, here is the point-- the man was a raging (literally) Libertarian, and he was defended by the ACLU (who lost the case).
Here is the Libertarian position on pornography:
B4. What is the libertarian position on art, pornography and censorship?
Libertarians are opposed to any government-enforced limits on free expression whatsoever; we take an absolutist line on the First Amendment. On the other hand, we reject the "liberal" idea that refusing to subsidize a controversial artist is censorship. Thus, we would strike down all anti-pornography laws as unwarranted interference with private and voluntary acts (leaving in place laws punishing, for example, coercion of minors for the production of pornography). We would also end all government funding of art; the label of "artist" confers no special right to a living at public expense.
It is VERY obvious that Ron Paul is at the very extreme right of a philosophy that embraces every filthy "liberty" that the wicked human soul can think of. Nude beaches, abortion, porn, nudity in public, killing old people and the sick, and "many other such things ye do" would follow in the wake of a Libertarian President and Govenment. A virtual Pandora's box of evil would be loosed on the USA if Ron Paul were elected because he, by definition OF HIS OWN BELIEF SYSTEM, would have to let all hell break loose or be called a traitor by his Libertarian voting base.
Now, Chuck Baldwin calls me a traitor to America, and he implies that YOU AND I are responsible for the murder of 60 million unborn babies? That is exactly what he is doing.
On the contrary, Mr. Chuck Baldloser, by NOT voting for Ron Paul, I have delivered America from being turned into a hell hole of the whole earth.
me tell you exactly what Chuck Baldloser's destiny is
because of his attack on the Lord's Church:
First, he has taken up the office of the accuser of the brethren. Thus, he is under the authority of the following:
12:10 (KJV) And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation,
and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the
accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and
11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
This is Satan. Chuck Baldliar is the servant of Satan as Vice-President of hell.
Second, he is damned to hell for taking up the office of liar:
Revelation 21:27 (KJV) And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither whatsoever worketh abomination, or maketh a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life.
22:14 (KJV) Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right
to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
15 For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a lie.
Chuck Baldbarf regularly accuses the saints for the wickedness of Caesar and the US Government. Jesus never did that. Paul never did that. Chuck Baldwretch will go to hell if he does not repent of his open attacks and false accusations of the Lord's people in America.
If no open and obvious chastening happens to Chuck Baldwimp for his attack on the Lord's Church, then we know he is a bastard:
Hebrews 12:8 (KJV) But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.
sent by a reader:
Ron Paul is being a classic Libertarian-- sodomites would have a free ride under him as President. I also note that 99% of all Freemasons take the Ron Paul position on sodomy. This is another thing that makes be believe he is a closet Freemason.