PROPHECY--
ARABS Our
position regarding Arabs is that they are a permanent part of the Semitic family.
They, of course, do not receive the covenant promises God gave to Abraham,
but they DO figure in the future Messianic Age with specific promises to them
in Genesis, Isaiah, and Zephaniah. Please read Chapters
One and Two of ALLAH,
DIVINE OR DEMONIC? (Also available on CD), the editor's book available
from our Home page. Arabs
are the bad guys of the media and the Fundamental Baptist gang. How did
that happen? Answer: Ignorance. Who knows that for 400 years
Jews and Arabs lived as good neighbors in Baghdad AND Jerusalem? The Palestinians
and Jews suffered a like fate at the hands of the Ottoman Turks for hundreds of
years. The Palestinians and old world Jews of Jerusalem danced in the streets
as British General Allenby drove the Turks out of Jerusalem in 1920. Try
to pry that out of Marv Rosenthal. No, the Palestinians are all firewood for hell
to the overage Fundamental Baptist today. |
Who
knows that Maimonides, the famous Jewish scholar of Spain, and the leading Jewish
thinker since the time of Christ, wrote nearly all his works in Arabic? On
this page, there will be no Arab bashing. Indeed, we look for Arab Christians
to send in their observations as to present day and future events in the light
of the King James Bible. We
do not have a breath of sympathy for the religion of Islam. It is by far
one of the most degrading religions ever hatched in hell. We simply do not
allow ourselves the error of confounding the love of Arabs with our hate for the
Islamic system. Muslims around the world are coming to Christ in ever increasing
numbers. We want to encourage this further. Please
send any events or information which you feel have any prophetic character with
regard to the Arab people. Again, to see how we view the Arabs and prophecy,
read the chapters from the Editor's book mentioned above.
ARTICLES
ON ARAB ISSUES:
Allah, Divine
or Demonic?
The Journey of a pagan god from Babylon to
Mecca
GUEST
EDITORIAL ON SAUDI ARABIAIs
is acceptable form to suspect Saudi Arabia, accuse them, and find them guilty
of aiding terror, while, in fact, we cannot produce hard evidence to that effect?
Is it OK simply because the Saudis are Muslim, and Islam supports terror as a
theological option? If we are pro-Israel, and the Saudis are anti-Israel, does
that allow us to lie about the Saudis? Are we right when we are wrong? Do we care?
Does the Bible still teach us to [Romans 12:17] "Recompense to no man evil
for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men."? These
days, with the false claims of a Christian faith by a Freemason named George Bush,
we see a lot of flag waving and "God bless America" in the streets.
So, will we Bible believers allow the media and the Federal spin masters turn
us to mindless hate because we have inhaled the incense of the cultural moment--
a culture of war making and retaliation? Truth does not benefit, in its application
to life, by exaggeration and speculation. In fact, truth is lost and vulgarized
by speculation.  The
following letter from "Michael" helps call us to think straight.
The Saudi Government--
Question: Is it or is it not linked to terrorism? It's a question that attracts
more questions than answers.
Answer: If a link as tenuous as a donation from a charitable organisation finding
its way into the hands of a person who may have committed a terrorist act, then
quite possibly so. However,
that connection is as remote as an American citizen's purchase of a soft drink
and the sales tax finding its way to finance terrorism in El Salvador, sponsored
by the US government. The well known patriot Colonel Oliver North
knows
a bit about that sort of thing! Largest
mosque in USA- Dearborn, Mighigan
Photo
credit to Rough and Ready
at Flickr
The essence of the analysis is whether the donations by charitable organisations
to individuals were made knowing that the money was to be used to support terrorist
actions. On the micro level, the final use by the end user of every Riyal or Dollar
from a collection box can't be traced or followed or confirmed with 100 percent
accuracy.
So far, nothing useful has been said, insofar as speculation, pages missing from
reports and op-ed pieces in the media provide more heat than light and facts are
woefully short.
The 27 deleted pages from a congressional record are alleged to contain "very
direct, very specific links that cannot be passed off as rogue, isolated or coincidental."
They are said by senior US officials to depict a Saudi Government that "not
only provided significant money and aid to the 9/11 hijackers, but potentially
allowed hundreds of millions of dollars to flow to Al Qaeda and other terrorist
groups through suspect charities and other fronts."
Potentially? Depict? Potentially, getting out of bed leads to death; safer to
stay where you are. Much in the manner of the "weapons of mass destruction"
debate and Tony Blair�s much vaunted but now entirely discredited Dossier on
Iraq, potential is all that is offered. Depiction or description isn't the production
of fact.
The same congressional investigators that described these "potentials"
also admit that they "found no specific evidence" proving that Saudi
top officials "notably members of the Royal Family" conspired in any
way to fund the Sept. 11 attack or other acts of terrorism.
Not only has the Saudi government called for the release of the missing pages
from the congressional report, so have several dozen US lawmakers. Editor:
Steve Van Nattan comments
Aside from the FACT that buildings NEVER fall precisely
in their footprint unless they are demolished professionally, and aside from the
FACT that the ONLY buildings which fall in 12 seconds are demolished buildings,
the FACT that the congressional record is closed, indeed, missing entirely, is
clear proof the the 9/11 event was a "false flag" event. To use 9/11
to declare war, massacre Arabs in the Middle East, put suspects under indefinite
arrest in Cuba, and attack mosques in the USA is insane. Yes, Islam teaches Jihad
and death, but no American would want to be convicted of murder simply on the
hearsay of someone who read about something done by other people than himself.
Furthermore;
we now see that Congress has passed a bill, under color of anti-terrorism, which
permits the US Military to arrest without warrant ANY American who is judged to
be as little as belligerent-- all based on 9/11. This is the stuff of Nazism and
the reign of terror by Idi Amin in Uganda. If it had not been for the belligerants
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Ben Franklin, there would be no USA.
Speculation feeds the media. Opinions are cheap and plentiful and descriptions
of "potentials" very often repackaged and sold as fact at worst or at
least knowledgeable comment.
Whilst this feeds up the news famine, it's time for some hard, checkable facts....
please? Editor:
I have grown up on the missionfield as a kid, and my wife and I have been
missionaries in Africa in Ethiopia and Kenya. I learned long ago that certain
missionaries were agents of the US Government, some even on contract to the CIA.
Some of the information gathered by these missionaries was very likely used to
depose and assassinate national leaders. Back
in the "home church" people supported these missionaries and prayed
for them. When the missionary came on furlough, the home folks believed the reports
of salvation and baptisms and the alleged national church the missionary was planting.
In reality, the missionary was living the life of Riley, eating steaks at the
Hilton several times a week, and eagerly serving his real boss in Washington DC.
Does this make the supporting "home church" members guilty of complicity?
Go figure.
BACK
TO PROPHECY MENU BACK
TO THE TITLE PAGE ge
|
