|  EFFEMINATE 
CHRISTIANITY AND MODERN BIBLE VERSIONS
  
By Daryl R. Coates      Attempts to Reduce, Change, 
or Simplify the Bible's Vocabulary
 Are Typical of an Effeminate "Christianity."
  The foolish attempt to discredit the word "baptize" in the King James 
Bible is an effeminate tactic to disarm the English-speaking saints of God. English 
has the largest vocabulary of any language in history, and its largeness is the 
result of English's masculinity. In 1905 Danish linguist Otto Jespersen, one of 
the premier scholars of the history of the English language, wrote in Growth and 
Structure of the English Language (rpt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 
1982),   English is more masculine than most languages. We see 
this in many ways. ... The business-like, virile qualities of the English language 
also manifest themselves in such things as word order.... In England every writer 
is, and always has been, free to take his words where he chooses, whether from 
the ordinary stock of everyday words, from native dialects, from old authors, 
or from other languages, dead or living. The consequence has been that English 
dictionaries comprise a larger number of words than those of any other nation, 
and that they present a variegated picture of terms from the four quarters of 
the globe. Now, it seems to be characteristic of the two sexes in their relation 
to language that women move in narrower circles of the vocabulary, in which they 
attain to perfect mastery so that the flow of words is always natural and, above 
all, never needs to stop, while men know more words and always want to be more 
precise in choosing the exact word with which to render their idea, the consequence 
being often less fluency and more hesitation.   It has been statistically 
shown that a comparatively greater number of stammerers and stutterers are found 
among men (boys) than among women (girls). Teachers of foreign languages have 
many occasions to admire the ease with which female students express themselves 
in another language after so short a time of study that most men would be able 
to say only a few words hesitatingly and falteringly, but if they are put to the 
test of translating a difficult piece either from or into the foreign language, 
the men will generally prove superior to the women. With regard to their native 
language the same difference is found, though it is perhaps not so easy to observe. 
   At any rate our assertion is corroborated by the fact observed by 
every student of languages that novels written by ladies are much easier to read 
and contain much fewer difficult words than those written by men. All this seems 
justify us in setting down the enormous richness of the English vocabulary to 
the same masculinity of the English nation which we have encountered in so many 
other fields. (pp. 15-16)   Efforts, then, to remove words 
from the King James Bible (like the efforts to produce modem "bibles" that are 
"easier-to-read" and "more up-to-date" and have "simplified vocabularies") are 
symptomatic of the effeminate spirit and tendencies of the Bible's critics. Such 
a spirit is why a lesbian helped to polish up the sodomite generated "style" of 
the perverted New International Version (NIV) "bible", why the NIV committee later 
(like the New Revised Standard Version and Contemporary English Version committees 
before it) tried to produce a "gender inclusive" perversion of God's words, why 
ministries and movements that are headed by and which cater to women are drawn 
to the false "bibles", and why "Christianity" at the close of the twentieth century 
is composed of so many ministers who would rather weakly "keep promises" than 
"Be strong and quit (them)selves like men" (1 Sam. 4:9).   If this seems 
overstated, consider the thesis put forth by Leonard Shlain in his 1999 book The 
Alphabet Versus the Goddess: the Conflict Between Word  and Image: 
   Goddess worship, feminine values, and women's 
power depend on the ubiquity of the image. God worship, masculine values, and 
men's domination of women are bound to the written word. Word and image, like 
masculine and feminine, are complementary opposites. Whenever a culture elevates 
the written word at the expense of the image patriarchy dominates. [Then we can 
also assume that when a culture elevates the image at the expense of the written 
word, matriarchy dominates-as in Hillary Clinton and Janet Reno and Donna 
Shalala and female Supreme Court justices ad infinitum.] (Qtd. on page 
6 of the June 1999 The Quality Paperback Book Review.)   
As an obviously agnostic and feminist (and possibly pagan) "scholar," Shlain 
fails to grasp the true significance of his discovery that (in the words of the 
June 1999 The Quality Paperback Book Review), "the very act of reading 
an alphabet reinforce[s] the brain's left hemisphere (linear, abstract, predominantly 
masculine) at the expense of the right (holistic, concrete, visual, feminine)." 
  It's hardly surprising, then, that in our culture literacy 
and morality decreased and goddess worship increased following a rising emphasis 
on images (picture magazines and books; television; viewscreens; video games; 
computer icons), or that antichrist will employ an image to further enslave people 
in the tribulation. Nor is it surprising that there was no success in any "women's 
movements" until Great Britain and America both abandoned the AV 1611 in favor 
of counterfeit "bibles", nor can there be any ecumenical success unless men abandon 
the AV 1611 in favor of the words of a "woman" (Rev. 17-18).    
Every English "bible" for more than a century has derived in some way from 
the Catholic text of a "whore" who is "THE MOTHER OF Immorel HARLOTS" and "drunken 
with the blood of the saints" (Rev. 17:5-6). The best way to resist her spirit 
is to stay true to the masculine text produced by the masculine Spirit of the 
masculine God who gave His only begotten Son so "that he might redeem us from 
all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works" 
(Tit. 2:14). Those who abandon the true masculine words of God will inevitably 
give themselves over to "profane and old wives' fables" (1 Tim. 4:6-7).   
Daryl CoatesSOLDIERS IN TRAINING
 1187 Highway 529
 Taylorsville, 
MS  39168
 
 
 BACK 
TO BIBLE STUDY AND SERMONS PAGE BACK 
TO ENTRY PAGE OF THE JOURNAL  
 ge
 |