- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- WAR ROOM -
STUDY - MORAL
ISSUES - KING
JAMES BIBLE - CULTS
OPPOSITIONS OF SCIENCE
Timothy 6:20 (KJV) O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust,
We consider Evolution to be a religion. If it were science, it could be proven by observation. It cannot. Also, it lacks vast areas of fossil evidence to sustain its notions. We reject it out of hand. We are bigots in this regard.
If you have new material that should be considered, and which sustains our presuppositions, please send it. We will NOT consider anything in favor of evolution any more than we would consider new evidence that the moon is made of green cheese. Indeed, that is more plausible than the evolutionary model. There at least IS green cheese in the universe.
Astronomers make lovely maps,
Of sky and cosmos filled with gaps;
Inhabited by speculations,
Rubber heads, and alien nations.
By your editor
Once you were a tadpole and began to begin,
Then you were a frog with your tail tucked in;
Next you were a monkey in a banyan tree,
Now you are a Doctor with a PhD.
By two distinguished young ladies in Michigan
"Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour.
Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute.
FINALLY, A MISSING LINK-- A hyeyote
EVOLUTIONISTS REFUSE TO TAKE THIS ACCOUNT SERIOUSLY
I was on the air in Los Angeles in 1977 when a report came across the wire that a Japanese fishing trawler off the coast of New Zealand had snagged and hauled up what for all the world appeared to be a dinosaur. Oh, sure, the thing was dead, but only dead for a few days. It was by no means a fossil or anything like unto it. It gave every evidence that it was a type of animal that the elusive "Nessie" is supposed to be (plesiosaurus).
To this day I have a photo of the thing. It is no whale, and tests on its flesh confirmed in was no shark.
Regrettably, the ignorant fishermen threw the thing back because it was stinking up their catch. (!)
I remember commenting on the air that I would have gladly paid ten bucks to see the recently deceased dino. They tossed back a veritable gold mine to protect their hold full of fish!
Fortunately, a bona fide scientist was onboard observing, and he saved a sample of the animal's flesh for further evaluation. Again, the tests showed conclusively that it was not anything anyone had ever seen before!
And I recall (but can't remember the name of) an animal that certain explorers claimed was the real thing, and how most everyone scoffed UNTIL ONE WAS CAUGHT AND FILMED! The thing looked as though it was the offspring of a tiger and a hyena.
And just recently I saw a video clip of "something" that has been identified as a possible chupacabra. Not some fuzzy, out-of-focus Polaroid shot of a guy in a gorilla suit, but an actual movie. Now, I concede it may not be ol' chupa, but it certainly was SOMETHING that didn't look like anything anyone had ever seen!
"There are more things in heaven and earth..."
SO MUCH FOR EVOLUTION
Mar 11, 05-- OOOOPS
The following is from Sci-Tech Today, March 6: "An Australian academic who has examined the skeletal remains of a three-foot hominid discovered in an Indonesian cave and nicknamed a 'hobbit' disputed Friday a report that they represent a new species of human. Professor Maciej Henneberg, head of anatomy at Adelaide University, said he thought the bones found in 2003 on Indonesia's Flores island were simply those of a normal human stunted by a viral disease, microcephaly -- a conclusion rejected in the earlier report by another team of scientists.
That team analyzed the find and said the partial skeleton was evidence of a new, dwarf species of human. Their conclusion was reported on Science Express, the online edition of the U.S. journal Science. Henneberg spent several days in Jakarta last month ... 'I had time to thoroughly inspect the bones of the skeleton,' Henneberg said. 'This skeleton is not a skeleton of a healthy, normal individual. I am simply saying this is a human being who suffered from a growth disorder,' he said."
The following comes to us from Researchers Don Korycansky of the University of California-Santa Cruz, Gregory Laughlin of NASA, and Fred Adams of the University of Michigan.
(CNN) -- A group of astronomers has come up with a plan they claim will save life on Earth from an early demise. All it takes, they say, is moving the planet into a different orbit. Their deadline is about 3.5 billion years in the future.
At that time, the scientists say, the sun will be 40 percent brighter than it is today and the Earth will be too hot to sustain life. Even looking just a billion years down the road, the increased brightness of the sun would cause a "moist greenhouse" effect which will have a catastrophic impact on the planet.
Now, these geniuses want to find a way to move the earth out of its present orbit to be farther from the sun and save the earth for continued habitation. They are serious folks. They say they can change the earth's orbit by shooting an asteroid past the earth every 6000 years for the next 5 billion years. The asteroid will cause the earth to wobble and take a couple steps away from the sun, and they say this will need to be done only 83,000 times over the next 5 billion years.
But, here is the riot of it all. They are, by this proposal, blasting away the theory of evolution. You see, the earth has been orbiting right where it is for, allegedly, 3 trillion years, according to the theory of evolution.
So, if the sun will get 40% brighter in 5 billion years, this world would have been an ice cube of unbelievable cold temperatures for most of the common era of evolution.
Let's be generous and throw away one of the three trillion years the evolutionists ask for. If we divide 5 billion years into 2 trillion years, we get 400 such intervals in time. If one of these intervals into the future would result in a 40% brighter sun, then what would the sun look like 400 such intervals into the past? I gather the sun would have been so small that the earth would have been about the same temperature of Pluto. Nothing would have evolved and lived during such severe conditions.
Now, here is another thought from my humble and limited knowledge of science. I think the PhDs failed to take into account a couple of small details.
They need to find an asteroid, according to these brilliant PhDs, which is 62 miles across, which is headed, let's say, north at thousands of miles per hour. They then have to lasso the thing and turn it so it will head right across the bows of the earth, but not too close so it won't hit the earth and bust it.
To do this, the PhDs fail to tell us what kind of propulsion will be needed, how to get it to the fanny of the asteroid, attach it, and fly the thing into place. And, no one has bothered to figure out the cost. We haven't gotten anything into orbit bigger than a barn, but we are going to fly a rock 62 miles in diameter, and fly it half way across the solar system?
Lastly, who is going to convince the US Senate to fund these 83,000 flights? How will Ted Kennedy ever understand about flying rocks across the sky when he cannot drive his Oldsmobile home without running it off of a bridge?
is ironic is that these PhDs don't believe in God, creation, or the Word of God,
they believe that they can do all these tricks and fly rocks around the universe.
is the kind of idiotic rubbish modern scientists come up with, and only a perfect
would take them seriously. The same people who invent evolutionary fairy tales then
invent the notions of the sun burning us up.
MORE FROM DR. CHICKEN LITTLE
PERRY ROCKWOOD TRASHES EVOLUTION
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE SCHOLAR QUESTIONS THE
COSTANCY OF THE SPEED OF LIGHT-- LINK
EUGENICS IS REJECTED BY EVOLUTIONISTS
SAM GIPP ON GLOBAL WARMING
BLACK AMERICAN FAITH
PREVAILS OVER SCHOLARSHIP
WATER, WATER, EVERYWHERE, AND
THE EARTH IS TIPPING OVER
THE END OF EVOLUTION
CLONING AND THE ETHICS OF ACCELERATED
EVOLUTION ARE HERE
YOU CAN GET BLOOD FROM A TURNIP!!!
Man will NEVER make life on God's terms.
One day a group of scientists got together and decided that man had come a long way and no longer needed God. So they picked one scientist to go and tell Him that they were done with Him. The scientist walked up to God and said, "God, we've decided that we no longer need you. We're at the point that we can clone people and do many miraculous things, so why don't you just go on and get lost?"
God listened very patiently and kindly to the man and after the scientist was done talking, God said, "Very well, how about this, let's say we have a man-making contest."
To which the scientist replied, "OK, great!"
But God added, "Now, we're going to do this just like I did back in the old days with Adam."
The scientist said, "Sure, no problem" and bent down and grabbed himself a handful of soil.
God just looked at him and said, "No, no, no. You go get your own soil !"
By Steve Van Nattan- Editor of this journal
You need to understand that the whole Christian apologetic is based on faith, and that faith in only revealed in the Word of God. Many cults try to prop up the alleged believer by adding more revelation, such as the Book of Mormon for the Mormons. That is like trying to convince a driver to stop at an intersection by putting up ten STOP signs rather than one.
Now, you will be challenged by Atheists and Evolutionists to present a physical proof of God that can be tasted, touched, smelled, or experienced in some finite manner other than by faith. That is impossible for the true Bible believer. But, it is also the same for the Atheist and the Evolutionist. He cannot present a physical proof that God does NOT exist. God has chosen to conceal himself from the laboratory, and the scientist rages at that fact. If the scientist were to find God in a laboratory, he would patent him and try to sell him to Monsanto.
So, your only argument in the ultimate is your faith, faith in the Word of God, and faith in the order of the universe as proof that there had to be a designer.
Hebrews 11:1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.
2 For by it the elders obtained a good report.
3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
Faith is substance.
Faith is evidence.
God nowhere offers the bright minded and the Oxford graduate a pass from using faith alone in dealing with him or his Word. So, you are a damned fool if you try to defend the Christian Faith and the Bible by scientific means. God has simply not given you that option, and your exalted view of your mental agility and your impressive elocution will not be acceptable to God. Read the verses above again if you do not believe me.
Faith is the tool which God gives us, after our conversion and confession of faith, by which we may prove to ourselves that God did everything he said he would do. The Atheist totally lacks the tool, faith, by which to test Truth. This is why it is folly to debate Creation versus Evolution. We are called to declare the Faith which God delivered to us. If you debate the faith, and in your human frailty you are unable to stand up to a clever minded Atheist, the Truth loses as you lose. If you declare the Faith, not accepting the possibility that there is any alternative, the Truth wins every time.
When you are driving in the city, and you come to an intersection with all of its traffic lights, and when the light for you is green, do you stop anyway and look both ways to be sure the cross-traffic actually is obeying their red lights? No, you have faith in the lights. You have faith in wicked human beings-- that they will stop.
Given all the possible cases in which the lights could fail, and given the propensity of certain drivers to run red lights, you are really gambling. But, you live, for the most part, in full faith in traffic lights. So, if you can trust in traffic lights to provide you a safe path through the city, can you trust in God?
God will not come and sit by the side of the road and wave at you. This is where the Evolutionist and Atheist hit a brick wall. They fail to be able to move from their faith in traffic lights, and faith in other drivers to comply, and move on to faith in a God who is there.
So, do not try to convince Atheists and Evolutionist. They are living with a presupposition which has so embalmed their minds in tangible evidences that they have no place for the intangible, metaphysical, or the world of spirits. I do note though that a good number of Atheists and Evolutionists wander regularly into the investigation of the metaphysical, but only if they are very sure the God of the Bible is not going to be at the seance or spook gathering. There is nothing more silly than an Atheist sitting on a power spot in Sedona, Arizona hoping to get his batteries charged by the universe made of rocks and hot gas. Hot gas................... hmmmm.
In the end, your faith did not come from a vending machine in heaven. Your faith came in a person, God the Son. No man can find faith to believe anything without finding first a personal relationship with Jesus Christ:
Hebrews 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
John 6:65 And he said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except it were given unto him of my Father.
Galatians 2:20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
Faith "OF" the Son of God ! Faith is OF Jesus Christ, not merely IN him. In John 6 you also read that it is given to you of God to come to Christ. Thus, an Atheist is simply a person who needs to have a long chat with God himself and ask for the faith OF Jesus Christ. In rage, he wanders about looking for recruits to his blind world. And in rage, he attacks anyone with faith. Richard Dawkins is easily the most obvious example of this rage against any person on earth who has faith in anything, including Muslims and Hindus.
Luke 2:49 And he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father's business?
Stop wasting your life trying to herd Atheists and Evolutionists into heaven. They must go find God for themselves. Only if you find an Atheist or Evolutionist who is a SINCERE seeker should you try to help them.
THIS DOCUMENTARY SHOWS THE DESPERATION EVOLUTIONISTS HAVE TO MAKE THEIR SYSTEM WORK AND DEFINE THEMSELVES.
EVOLUTION IS BEING QUESTIONED BY EVOLUTIONISTS
IT SEEMS WE WILL HAVE TO CUT DOWN
ALL THE TREES AFTER ALL
National Geographic has egg on their face-- From a bird / lizard ???
Nevertheless, a bird in the hand is worth a lizard in the other hand.
More on the bird from China and other frauds
Very good article dealing with the intellectual insanity in evolution
Iceberg the size of Delaware, and ice shelf the size of Rhode Island collapse in Antarctica-- So what?-- This is what we would expect of a world that is still getting over Noah's flood.
THE CONTINENTAL SHELF:
One of the most deadly discussions to evolutionists is to try to explain the continental shelf around ALL land masses worldwide. Glaciers are used to explain this, but glaciers do NOT explain the shelf around the Indonesia area and the tropics. There were not enough glaciers to provide the amount of water needed to cover the world's shelf. As a starting point, and to show that the sea is still rising, go to: http://pubs.usgs.gov/factsheet/fs102-98/ Another question is why all the oil under the continental shelf. There had to be organic material buried there in vast quantities to explain this, and this had to happen at the same time as the oil generation on dry land. So, how is this? Evolution cannot keep it all together under its timeline of change and uniformatarianism. Here is another example of the self-driven evolutionist apologetic at work explaining the river/shelf activity:
I am 100% convinced that if honest search were made, civilizations and cities would be found at many places along the continental shelf. But, this is the sort of thing that will NEVER happen since it would trash the geological column and the dating of man and the earth. I have a real feeling that there WAS an Atlantis, and it is on the edge of the shelf at the ancient mouth of some presently existing river. If Archaeologists were to dig along the shelf edge, I am sure they would find tons of treasures and possibly double the content of our museums. Men have always chosen river mouths at the shoreline for trade and climate purposes.
SABLE ISLAND-- 16mm 20 miles long and 1 mile wide, Sable Island lies 100 miles off the coast of Nova Scotia at the edge of the continental shelf. This isolated island is at the brink of vast oil and natural gas deposits. How did the dinosaurs get our there to become oil?
Doctrinaire evolutionary shelf explanation:
Very interesting journey
An evolutionist who should be arrested for fraud:
Discussion of Bible Truth Which Predated Schience:
Association for Biblical Astronomy-- Director: Dr. Bouw--
Mother Goose in the Church House--
Creation Research Society:
Creation Evidences: http://www.advancemeants.com/creation/
- Answers in Genesis
- C.A.P.O. -- The Center for the Advancement of Paleo Orthodoxy is a born-again Christian ministry that is concerned with promoting creationism.
- Center For Scientific Creation -- A site promoting Walter Brown's books, and asking some "questions for evolutionists".
- Creation/Evolution Reference Database
- Creation Science Home Page
- Institute For Creation Research -- Duaine Gish and Henry Morris, the founding fathers of modern "scientific creationism", founded this organization.
- Kronia: PLANETARY HISTORY / PLANETARY CATASTROPHE -- DISCLAIMER: A site devoted to IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY, who wrote a book called "Worlds In Collision", which alleged that Saturn and Venus had both smashed into the earth, or passed close enough to it to cause all of the Biblical disasters in the Old Testament.
- Reasons To Believe Home Page -- This is a creationist web site offering "Facts & Faith" magazine, and the virtual home of Dr. Hugh Ross, PhD.
- Riley Sinder's Creationism
- Scientific Proofs of God and Creation Science
- Ted Holden's Anti-Evolution
A PITIFUL TIME OF HARVEST-- May, 2004
WHAT TRAGIC SHAME HAS BEEN BROUGHT AGAINST OUR LORD
Mark 12:13 And they send unto him certain of the Pharisees and of the Herodians, to catch him in his words.
14 And when they were come, they say unto him, Master, we know that thou art true, and carest for no man: for thou regardest not the person of men, but teachest the way of God in truth: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar, or not?
15 Shall we give, or shall we not give? But he, knowing their hypocrisy, said unto them, Why tempt ye me? bring me a penny, that I may see it.
16 And they brought it. And he saith unto them, Whose is this image and superscription? And they said unto him, Caesar's.
17 And Jesus answering said unto them, Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's. And they marvelled at him.
Brother Kent Hovind, highly esteemed speaker on evolution, and a defender of the King James Bible and Creationism--
Was raided by the IRS recently.
This was predictable, for brother Hovind has been exalting Tax Rebellion in his speaking engagements and videos.
Proverbs 17:11 An evil man seeketh only rebellion: therefore a cruel messenger shall be sent against him.
Kent Hovind is now paying the
ultimate price for rebellion against
Caesar-- He is in prison, and NOT
for the cause of Christ and the Gospel.
Albert Einstein could not escape the conclusion that God is out there.
"My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able toperceive with our frail and feeble mind. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible Universe, forms my idea of God."
The present hate for Christian faith by scientists simply shows how small minds can become, given enough entropic lapse.
This is war, and you CANNOT stand on both sides.
Theistic Evolution is a choice of damnation.
Steven Hocking, in spite of his handicap, has managed to dive into the black hole of cosmic evolution. He will very likely be sucked in to his death and damnation. Why? Simply this-- he refused to be introduced to a designer.
He wants to believe that a perfect vacuum can produce a man and a mango.
Do you feel a bit dirtied by the last two videos?
Here, stop a moment, let me wash your feet.
BACK TO WAR ROOM- General Wickedness
BACK TO MORAL ISSUES MENU PAGE