THE "BEAST"--
WILL HE INDEED
BE A BEAST?
A Study in End Times Evil
PART
ONE: The Present Issue--
From Tom Parker
CLONING TEAMS CROSS PIG & HUMAN D.N.A.
Scientists have successfully produced an embryonic pig-human hybrid. Human DNA was inserted into pig cells which became tiny embryos. The researchers have not revealed what happened to them, but suggest they could have been grown further by being implanted into a womb - and that either a pig or a human mother would have been suitable. Nobody knows whether the hybrid embryos could have become living beings. They would be much more human than pig because about 97% of DNA is in the nucleus, which was human. There would, however, be some effect from the 3% of DNA from the pig.
The intentions of the researchers are not made clear in an application they have submitted to the European Patent Office. However, such embryos would be ideal for research into therapeutic cloning, when cells are cloned, grown into tissues such as nerve cells and then used to treat a patient. The researchers, from Stem Cell Sciences in Australia and Biotransplant in America, both big players in the biotechnology industry, took a cell from a human foetus, extracted the nucleus and then inserted it into a pig's egg cell. Two embryos were grown to the 32-cell stage, which took a week.
Experts in medical ethics are deeply concerned about the patent application, which has a strong chance of being granted. They say the research exploits loopholes in European law. It is not illegal because the embryo is not technically human. Dr Richard Nicholson, editor of the Bulletin of Medical Ethics, said: "This kind of research depends on devaluing human beings." (The London Times)
--------------------- comment ------------------------------
2 Peter 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-word, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.Matthew 24:22 And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened.
PART
TWO: Ramafications For the World and the Church--
From Steve Van Nattan
Let us now ask several questions:
Will the man/pig have a conscience.
Suppose he is older and one day rapes a woman. Will that be rape by a man, or will it just be a piggy instinct and not a crime?
What if the scientists decide to do research on the man/pig.
Will it be immoral for the scientists to kill the man/pig in the process?
Would it be evil for the USA or Russia to breed a man/pig, or a man/pit bull army?
Why would that be immoral in evolutionary terms?
Suppose the new creature was physically all beast, and mentally all man. Could this creature be the "Beast" of Daniel and the book of Revelation? I believe that we are either to the point where God must step in and stop this mania by sending Christ in the Rapture of the Church, or we are still a long way from the Rapture, and the human race is now entering a new phase. This phase will be the time when man makes it 100% necessary for God to destroy the whole human/animal race except for the few who are not genetically animal and man. If this happens, the true Bible believer will have to refuse to deal with all sorts of things of unimaginable proportions. Human/animal beings will be entering the world for many reasons, and Bible believers will have to decide what to do with them.
Now, here are the questions which we may one day face in biblical terms.
Is a man/pig accountable to God?
Can a man/pig be elected to salvation?
Should we give the man/pig the Gospel?
If a man/pig shows a zeal for the Gospel, should be refuse to invite him to Christ?
Some soft headed saints will say, "Of course. Give him the Gospel." OK, now tell me this, thou soft head-- Did Jesus die for the sins of the pig? No? Well then, is a man pig redeemable?
The vast majority of the TV evangelists and Evangelicals will go all mushy and start a program of evangelism to the man/pigs of the world. Then, the United Nations et al will start a program of defending the civil rights of the men/pigs, thus protecting them from being exploited by Christians who want to allegedly get them saved.
You think you have problems now, Bunkey, you just stick around. You ain't seen nothin' yet.
Francis Schaeffer confronted the Christian community in 1972 that genetic terror was about to descend on the Blip and the world, and he called the Lord's Church to stand up and make a statement and try to stop the process. Schaeffer attended conferences where Crick, Jaques Monad, and BF Skinner were calling, "for us to take charge of our evolution" in which these men said that whatever COULD be done SHOULD be done. The man/pig is simply a manifestation of that statement. If you preachers are shocked, you are a bit silly, for you had your chance, over the past 30 years to make you voice heard, and most of you said nothing. Too busy getting the numbers up and your resume pretty, right?
Will you print this item and pass it around? It is about time the Lord's Church did just one thing BEFORE the fact. Sixty million murdered babies proved one thing well-- The preachers of America waited too long to make a fuss. If you don't want to stand in line at the market with a man/pig, you better get your porci posterior out of your plush chair at the church office and hit the street. If you don't want your grandchildren going to kindergarten with a boy/dog, you need to get the thing under control NOW. Some people have their noses in the feed trough so deep that they sound and act like pigs already. If you don't want the UN to force you to take a man/pig into church membership, NOW is when you deal with it buster! Hey, preacher, what will you say when a lady and a man/pig ask you to marry them, and the penalty for refusing is to go to the War Crimes Tribunal and be tried for violating the Genocide Treaty? Why not act NOW?
Again, consider this-- The Beast of the End Times may well be a true beast with a man's heart. How will you answer God when He wants to know why you said nothing against this travesty of His creative prerogatives?
PART THREE: Is this Only Fiction?
By Steve Van Nattan
A science lab is doing research in bio-genetics, and their goal is to produce a pig with the growth and immunity qualities of humans. A being of humanoid qualities is not the issue. They intend to only genetically move human DNA into the pig and its future offspring which would make a pig that would come to market faster and be healthier. If this worked, other animal DNA or RNA would be added over time, from other animals, to breed up the best pig in the world. Millions of pork eating people worldwide would eat better, and markets would also benefit.
The problem with the scientist's research was that they did not take into account that conflicts would develop between the pig's make up and the human, and they also grabbed a couple of genes of DNA which they did not intend to be added. The result was that the pig they raised in the uterus of a female sow became huge as it came to term. The scientists were upset and were going to destroy the thing, but lots of money was involved, so they delivered the baby pig by cesarean section, and the thing lived and thrived.
The famale piglet became so healthy and fat in so short a time that the scientists decided they should keep it and raise it. It grew up to become a big old mama porker and was everyone's friend. The only strange thing about the pig was that it's ears looked very human, rounded, not pointed like a pig's, and the scientists were puzzled since they did not grab that gene or DNA in the design part of the experiment. Well, they THOUGHT they did not get that gene. Everyone agreed that they better be more careful next time. They did not kill the pig though. It would at least be interesting to study.
One day, while the research department was nearly vacant, the sow got out of her cage, and no one ever saw her again. Well, sort of. After about two years, a farmer called the University Bio Genetics Department and wanted to ask a question. It seems he had found a sow in his hog farm one day, and he didn't know where it came from. It was pretty normal really, but it did have funny looking ears-- almost human looking. The farmer asked his neighbors if they had lost any hogs, but none said they did, so he figured he would keep it.
Well, he thought he might as well breed the sow since it was the healthiest and biggest sow he had ever seen, and who knows, maybe the ears were an indication it was some sort of desirable mutation. It might even get him some attention with the State Fair people. He did breed the sow, and the piglets were nearly the same as the sow and the hog involved, but not quite. That is what the farmer was wanting to know from the Bio Genetics people at the University.
It seems the new piglets had a very humanoid nose-- Not squared off, but distinctly rounded with a definite tear drop curvature, more like a human nose...........
________________________________________
Impossible?
This used to be science fiction. It used to be silly. It is NOT silly anymore. Given the many errors and blunders of men of science, we have to wonder what is coming. We also know how business research labs will do evil boldly if they think they can get ahead of the competition and control more of the market share. We know they will lie-- witness Firestone's recent cover-up of their defective products. It is cheaper to pay wrongful death settlements than to do right. So, why not play fast and loose with genetics and just settle later if it goes bad? Also, we KNOW that things have gotten lose from research, and it usually is benign and harmless. But, there are many stories of close calls with disaster because someone turned their back at the wrong moment. Also, we are not all of the same ethic on this planet.
For the record, paragraph one is 100% based in experiments NOW in progress.
There may well be Hindu researchers who will think it is cool to combine the stages of reincarnation and make a transitional form of man/animal. Russian or Chinese researchers may be bribed by cash to come up with a new genetic form of animal which will be able to be triggered by some stimulus to attack on command. This would be used to torment some enemy.
Two other factors must be considered.
First, the science of this genetic game will get to be cheap and easy to do. In the early years of nuclear research, it was assumed that the use on nuclear power and weapons would be far too complicated for the small nations and single individuals. Some of you recall the guy who made a nuclear bomb in his garage in the 1970s. Well, the day will come when the average terrorist or mental case can make himself a mutant ninja turtle in his garage. These scientists, managers, and world leaders have no ethic. We have seen the mindless way in which the "good guys" of the free world use women, kill their enemies, exalt filthy sexual perversion, and generally live like criminals. So, what might we expect of the "bad guys"?
Second, there is the terror of leaving the barn door open. No one seems to be talking about the problem of what happens when some lab discards living material and it is absorbed into the environment. This has ALWAYS been a concern with bio-warfare research, so why would it not be a concern with bio genetics? Suppose living new forms of tissue of material were somehow sustained by the open environment, and suppose they thrived and reproduced? Suppose some living matter had the potential to change anything which ate it. Suppose....
No, it is no longer science fiction my friend.
LINKS:
READ THE WHOLE ARITCLE IN THE LONDON TIMES:
http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/10/08/stifgnaus01001.htmlHERE IS HOW THESE SCIENTISTS TREAT GOD'S CREATURES:
http://tao.ca/~ban/1099MSgeneticsuffering.htmLINK PAGE FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
http://www.umbi.umd.edu/~cab/Links.htmlHERE IS A GENETIC MONSTER-- The "approved" version is causing farmers to wonder if they will be causing damage to humans:
http://www.gks.com/library/biotech/monsanto.htmlI CANNOT BELIEVE WHO IS FIGHTING BIO-GENETIC ENGINEERING:
http://www.lifeofjesus.com/maitreya4.htmlINTERESTING ESSAY ON ETHICS AND MORALITY IN LEADERSHIP
http://www.niu.edu/~tp0blipm1/papers/fredpap.htmTHIS GROUP WANTS TO BRING JESUS BACK-- IN A TEST TUBE--
If these people succeed, and if the relics of the Catholic Church are frauds as we have heard, we may see the Beast soon.
http://www.foxnews.com/etcetera/101100/second_coming.sml
