Searching for the Truth in the King James Bible;
Finding it, and passing it on to you.

Steve Van Nattan






Response to Doug Mallett's accusation that we are a "Rambo for Christ" site


See Mallett's lies about us at:

This article will help you see why Bible believers may need to leave
the title, "Fundamentalist." We are under heavy attack from
hirelings who claim THEY are the true Fundamentalists.

For legal purposes: I have saved this web page to file as evidence in case the author
tries to slip away and claim I am being unfair with him.

This site has accused us of being a "Rambo For Christ" site. They have developed a very clever force of logic based on lies about us. So, I am taking their eleven accusations against us, and I am answering them. The reason I chose this site to respond to is that it seems to put into hate and speech the form of attack which is coming from inside the Lord's Church from hirelings who are screaming mad. They have been hit by our Bible based editorial. I notice that, of all the KJV Only people in the world, some who hit far harder than I do, this fellow picked only our site and that of David Cloud to attack.

Did you hear of the fellow who was so open minded that his brains fell out?

I think we have found him.

Here then are the qualities of which we are found accused, guilty, and condemned. These are the accusations that the world at large will soon use to attack the saints. We might as well start giving an answer.

Fundamentalists like Steve Van Nattan and David Cloud,
the only examples on this site, have these alleged qualities:


1. Belief they are the only true church.

Doug Malletts states:
KJV-Onlyism does not affiliate with any church or individual that does not preach or teach from the KJV-1611 bible alone. The assumption is that to preach or teach from a �corrupt� bible can only result in corrupt preaching and teaching. Some go so far to say that if one has made a profession of faith from anything other than KJV-1611 preaching, they are not saved.

Steve Van Nattan responds:
True and false. We do not affiliate with anyone. We have fellowship. This is an ecclesiastical accusation based on the assumption that all people affiliate. Our friends who teach us are KJV users. This we choose the same way this creep chooses his friends. But, you see, for a Bible believer to CHOOSE is to be a bigot, and to be exclusive is wicked to these diddle heads. This is the line of CBS, NBC, and NPR. It is cool when the author of this site separates from sinners by his definition, but when we make our choices, we are cultic and unreasonable. I also choose not to eat liver. And, I am so very sorry for that. Again, I am a bigot for choosing.

Ezekiel 44:23 (KJV) And they shall teach my people the difference between the holy and profane, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean.


2. Unquestionable authority.

Doug Malletts states:
Submitting to the authorities in the church is demanded. Those in authority are never to be questioned. Disobedience to authority is paramount to disobedience of God.

Steve Van Nattan responds:
This is a bold face devilish lie. We do not claim, nor do we allow, that any saint submit to the authority of any human authority. We suggest that the believer in Jesus Christ submit to the Word of God only. When a Bible believer finds fellowship that is in line with the Word of God, he should participate in all ways that honor God. You need to know that the wicked simply invent these accusations. This is the same trick used for several centuries by the Holy Office of the Inquisitor General of the Roman Catholic Whore Church, and this fellow will be WITH them and AGAINST us in the Last Days.

The author, on his web site, takes many of my statements out of context, but I note that most of them were when I was dealing with high handed jack boot preachers. He mocks at me, and plays tricks with my words, and now he accuses me of doing the very thing which I was fighting on my site. He KNEW what I was doing, but he accuses me of being authoritarian. I think we have a Cardinal Ratzinger here who makes the rules as he goes along.

Proverbs 8:5 (KJV) O ye simple, understand wisdom: and, ye fools, be ye of an understanding heart.

There was something else on my pages that made this fellow mad, and he will NOT discuss it. Sin? A big belly? Porn? I have no idea why he makes no comment on these topics on my site. Maybe he is divorced and remarried. The point is this-- when a man sees that you are taking up HIS cause in your contentions and teachings, such as against jack boot preachers and guruism in the Lord's Church, why does he turn around and attack you? Answer: Something much bigger is bugging him. Come on buddy, tell us what really got your nose out of joint.


3. Control through fear tactics.

Doug Malletts states:
Threats of loss of salvation, abandonment, rejection, missing the rapture, going to hell are common. Sometimes this includes threats of God�s judgment coming upon the children or other loved ones for disobedience to the authorities.

Steve Van Nattan responds:
Let me give you a selection of VERY threatening links at our site :-)

These are just a few of many other pages that encourage, comfort, and entertain the saints with interesting and useful things. Of course, this creep will brush these aside and say that no amount of comfort and encouragement of the saints will make up for one nasty article at our site against the NIV.

So, my dear creep, as we say in Texas, "Deal with it".


4. Control through intimidation.

Doug Malletts states:
Questioning authority is treated as rebellion against God. Often called sins of pride and rebellion. Many times this includes public humiliation before the church body.

Steve Van Nattan responds:
Lie. Out the dung gate with this rubbish!

Questioning the Word of God is rebellion against God.

The believer is not instructed in the New Testament to always be ready to ask a question. Rather; we are told the opposite:

1 Peter 3:15 (KJV) But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear:

Anyone who questions ME is welcome at my site. In fact, anyone who has ever sent me email and told me they agree with me on everything on the site is lovingly rebuked and told to learn to be a "noble Berean" and prove all teachers by checking them against the Word of God. What makes this creep mad is that he is being questioned in his defense of the NIV etc. So, the lie is used, and a false libelous attack is used. Ha Ha, boy, I laugh at you.

Romans 3:4 (KJV) God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

For the record, I never questioned this idiot, and I did not know of him until I did a search for my name at Google. So, how did I get to be one of only two wild and woolly KJV only models for his hate? I thank God I hit the pest square between the eyes. Furthermore; this creep makes no mention of Dr. Peter S. Ruckman. He is FAR more aggressive in his attacks on these NIV gurus than I am. I believe he sees me as a weak and puny target. If he went after Ruckman, he would get a royal thrashing. So, I am delighted to be considered weak and puny and harmless. That is what Austria and Germany thought of Otto Von Bismark. I like it like that.


5. Control over person's personal lives.

Doug Malletts states:
This often includes where to move, who to marry, what jobs to work. In other words, over most aspects of individuals personal lives. Often this spills over into personal involvement by the church authorities in the training and rearing of their children.

Steve Van Nattan responds:
What bilge and equestrian leavings.

I attack this sort of thing all over my site these days. He knows it also I suspect. I control no one. I have no following. No one stops by my home and asks my opinion. I don't get that much email, and when I am asked to give a verdict from a distance on someone's life choices, I decline because I cannot tell from a distance what their situation really is. Again, the man just plain lied. He is antichrist.

2 Corinthians 7:2 (KJV) Receive us; we have wronged no man, we have corrupted no man, we have defrauded no man.
3 I speak not this to condemn you: for I have said before, that ye are in our hearts to die and live with you.
4 Great is my boldness of speech toward you, great is my glorying of you: I am filled with comfort, I am exceeding joyful in all our tribulation.


6. Personal public confession of sin.

Doug Malletts states:
Supposedly to gain trust in the group but more than often is used as a weapon against those who may be thinking of leaving the group.

Steve Van Nattan responds:

I have no group. No one has ever confessed sin in my presence because of any association with me at my web site. This site author owes me confession of sin though for lying about me. And, I dare him to drive to Kingston, Tennessee and stand toe to toe with me and retract these accusations. He will not, because all these diddle heads are wimps, not warriors.

1 Corinthians 14:12 (KJV) Even so ye, forasmuch as ye are zealous of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church.

For the record, I am vicious, in my journal, with Fundamentalists who abandon edification of he saints in order to control them. Mallett is a damned liar.


7. Isolation.

Doug Malletts states:
Members are discouraged or not allowed to have contact with those outside of the church. Contact with former members is especially discouraged or forbidden.

I have no church.

I have no members.

No one on earth has been forbidden by me from fellowship with someone else.

I exercise NO power over anyone.

Again, the slow belly just made this up. Furthermore; I know many KJV only men, and 90% of them are pastors of small churches and have very little power over the masses, as do NIV junkies like John MacArthur and Dallas Seminary. Even Peter Ruckman, who has something of a following, is a pariah to most Fundamentalists. Where is this big tough KJV only man, huh?

Psalms 133:1 (KJV) Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity!


8. Us against them mentality.

Doug Malletts states:
Anybody who may question the teachings of the church is automatically considered an enemy. To listen to any teaching other than what they are receiving in the group is considered consorting with the enemy. This is taken personal with the leadership and often tells the member that only they are concerned and are caring for their soul. Guilt of feeling that you are betraying the only one who truly cares for you is another form of control.


We DO indeed have a war on our hands.

Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

The battle is with Satanic forces. If this site owner and his friends take up with Satan and his funny bibles, they will indeed find themselves defined as the enemy. Man makes choices, and this creep has made his. He needs to learn to live with that. It sounds like the site author believes we are not allowed to examine HIS teachings. So, this is a case of the pot calling the kettle black.

Israel had a dung gate, and they used it. Thus, we assign such dung as this fellow's lies to the dung gate also.


9. Pride and excessive devotion to the church.

Doug Malletts states:
Often the appeal to the pride that the member is in an exclusive church is used to keep an unhealthy devotion to the church. Often one must prove their devotion with excessive commitment and involvement in all church activities. This often leads to no time for anything outside of church activities. This can also extend to excessive tithing as evidence of your commitment to both church and to God.

Which church? I want to know which local church I control, or which local church controls me. This jerk de jeur could not produce such a model in my regard if he were offered a million dollars to do so. Zip Zero. No church. Furthermore; I have several articles in the journal warning saints about pastors who take the family apart by demanding their services in church programs. I guess little Dougy failed to read enough.

Tithing? Obviously, the liar has not been reading much at my site. He hates my KJV defense, so he read no further. Try this, Herr Jerkenheimer--


10. Emphases upon holy and righteous living.

Doug Malletts states:
Generally this includes dress codes, eating habits, finances, activities, time spent, possessions and relationships with others. What to say, when to say, what to read, what to see what to do and what not to do is the general message from the pulpit.

So, dear idiot-- Dress is an issue with even Liberals and the Pope. You just don't like the dress issues we discuss. Also, you will not find laws on dress on our site. You will find suggestions on the ladies' pages which I do not edit. They are there for the modest women to use if they like them. The whores you hang out with can ignore our web site, and we will not say a word about it.

Finances-- zero on that at Blessed Quietness in 1500 articles. Ah, correction, I do prove that tithing laws are not for the Church Age-- sorry about that offensive teaching.

Activities? What is that?

Time spent? What on earth is that?

Possessions? Where do we make laws on that?

Relationships with others. Guilty-- we teach the saints to separate from those committed to prevarication, like you.


11. Double standards.

Doug Malletts states:
Generally the leadership is exempt when found guilty of the same activities that are forbidden of the members. One standard for the member and another for the leadership. More often than not, this is found to be of a sexual nature with the leadership.

PROVE ME GUILTY OF ANYTHING I TAUGHT SOMEONE NOT TO DO. In the mouth of two or three witnesses please.

You have NO proof of that. It is classic false accusation, and the office of accuser of the brethren is taken already. You are serving Satan when you make accusations you cannot back up. Where are the standards on my site, and which ones do I distinguish for one saint and not another? You filthy creep. You lie and lie and lie, and you will lie about Bible believers until the Lord's Church is taken out, and then you will be left here to lie about Jews and anyone who is born again during the Great Tribulation.

2 Peter 2:12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;
13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

I am not sinless, and I deal with things that God shows me regularly, and sometimes I may not deal with some sin in my life in the right way. I make no claims of sinless perfection, and I make not personal demands on ANY saint, not even this accuser who attacked me. He can sin and go to hell just as fast as he wishes-- I just wish he would go quietly. Better yet, I wish he would examine himself and see the crass lies he tells are a beam he needs to deal with before he comes around here searching for the mote.

If he is born again, he acts a lot like people I have known in my ministry in the past who were possessed of devils. He just does not think right. His mind seems twisted to the point where he cannot discern that he is doing service to Satan.



After attacking me as cultic and evil based on my stand on the King James Bible, read what this man says about anyone who is outside of HIS personal definition of Fundamentalism:

Those who oppose fundamental Christianity and try to apply the word �cult� are assuming that fundamental Christianity is a false religion and that theirs is the unified true religion. While not all beliefs outside of fundamental Christianity are cultic, it can be said that all beliefs outside of fundamental Christianity are false, empty religions that offer no salvation because they are essentially man�s attempts to save himself by becoming his own lord and savior.

His is a smaller world than mine, for he has no fellowship with KJV Only Bible believers. I gather he also damns Reformed believers. He defends the use of the NIV and other bibles I gather. I have had some very good fellowship with KJV only Anglicans, and I had a Roman Catholic priest friend in Arizona who was cleansing his church house of crucifixes and preaching 45 minute sermons on Sunday. He was a modern Luther, and, though we were miles apart in some areas, I have more hope of seeing him in heaven than seeing Doug Mallett there. Liars, who KNOW they are lying, and do not repent, go to hell.


Mallett, if that is indeed the site author, claims Babylon the Great of the End Times is not a real city.

Babylon has never been destroyed in the manner described by the prophets. This fellow needs to do some more study. I wonder what he would do if modern day Babylon were handed to the Pope, by the UN and Iraq, as an international city for all world religions. What if the Pope, or some other world religious leader, moved to Babylon, in the model of Zechariah 5?

Babylono has been largely restored by Saddam Hussein, and is now being finished to become a big tourist attraction. The Bible says that only owls and jackels will live in Babylon when God finally blows it away:

Babylon is an industrial city today:


This man takes the Church age into Matthew 24, which is ONLY for the Jews:

I do not believe we are presently in the beginning of the tribulation period, but I definitely believe the time we are in is the prelude setting up the beginning of the tribulation period. I believe this is the beginning of sorrows that Jesus spoke of in Matthew chapter 24. Jesus says there will be wars and rumors of wars, but be not troubled, because the end is not yet.

The Old Testament dispensation ends AT THE END OF MATTHEW 23. Much chaos in prophecy teaching comes from using Matthew 24 to predict the Church Age events.


He "tends to lean" (as in waffling) on some issues:

I tend to lean toward a pre-trib rapture for the reasons I have previously mentioned.


He mocks at the possibility that people may need deliverance from devils. He uses the counterfeit aspects of the deliverance ministries of Charismania to exclude all deliverance as far as I can tell. There is some very subtle writing here.


He mocks at the possibility of generational curses, or, I gather, generational possession issues. Again, he uses Charismainiacs as if they are the only ones dealing with this. It is a good thing this yo yo does his counseling on the Internet. If he ever ended up in India or Haiti, he might well come running home to the US having taken a real thrashing as he tried to counsel the devils out of the possessed.


In a study of demon possession, these people claim the Bible calls it "demon possession." The King James Bible never uses the word demon. That is a Greek word which is distinct from the word, devil, the biblical KJV word. Some mongrel bible version is used on the page, but most of his other pages have the KJV. Why does he flee from the KJV? Answer: He is terrified of dealing with devils, at least that is what I have found in all other men who rush from "devil" to "demon" in this sort of discussion.

The alleged study session runs to the Charismatics to find the enemy, and the Charismatics are heretic on the subject. But, that does NOT imply that the whole discussion of devil possession is over once we distinguish ourselves from Charismatics. These people are NOT dealing with the fact that devils had to be cast out as with the demoniac of Gaderra.

In Ethiopia one fellow was possessed and was not delivered until the men of the church had sung hymns of the Blood of Christ for about five hours. In Tanzania, fetishes had to be burned before the devils would finally leave. In the California High Desert the young man who threw his mother clear across the living room was not delivered until we had warfare prayer in his home and helped him confess faith in Jesus Christ at the church house instead of his home.

The real war involves casting out devils from both sinners and off of saints who get them like a dog gets fleas. The fact that these people do not want to deal with this, and they have a clever hermeneutic to bypass devil possession, feeds nicely into the hands of devils. Anyone coming to these people may never be delivered if they are possessed of devils. There ARE times when the devils talk and have to be confronted personally by the power of the Blood of Jesus Christ. I guess it boils down to where the real war is. Some people fight the battle with theological definitions and studies from a distance, while other saints war a good warfare where the devil has his strongholds.

There is a lot on deliverance, and it is all mocking. Go to Type "deliverance" into the search box, and see how much time they spend mocking at deliverance. This is classic form for most alleged Christian counselors.


Look at his Spiritual Warfare page.

Now, look at ours

His is all study and self-centered, and ours starts from the Word of God and ends up on the battle field.

I also note that this man is very good at short rounds in the back of people who are fighting the very same war he is. His problem is that he is using a butter knife and we are using a sword (the KJV). Poor fool.


I also tried to find out for sure who the author of the site is. It is very hard, and I am still not sure I found him. I had to dig through the site for a long time, and I came up with Doug Mallett. This still may not be the the site author. Almost all the people on the site hide behind pseudonyms, which points to something wrong. Why hide?



It appears to me that Doug Mallett is a Fundamentalist except for two issues. He uses funny bibles, and he wants a private interpretation on some prophecy issues and on deliverance from devils. This is classic form for many Fundamentalists. They want to be thought of as being on the narrow way, but they do not want to make their market for their book TOO narrow. So, they refuse to take a stand on the KJV and the history of the Greek texts, and they carve out a little private interpretation of their own so they can patent it and market it as something special. Same old hoochie kooch, same old rodeo. Been around for some time now.

1 Corinthians 4:10 We are fools for Christ's sake, but ye are wise in Christ; we are weak, but ye are strong; ye are honourable, but we are despised.
11 Even unto this present hour we both hunger, and thirst, and are naked, and are buffeted, and have no certain dwellingplace;
12 And labour, working with our own hands: being reviled, we bless; being persecuted, we suffer it:
13 Being defamed, we intreat: we are made as the filth of the world, and are the offscouring of all things unto this day.
14 I write not these things to shame you, but as my beloved sons I warn you.


And I warn Doug Mallett that if he keeps lying about Bible believers, and if he bases his attacks on their loyalty to the Word of God, he will catch a threshing from God. This seems like a waste of a life when there are all these people on the Internet whom he alleges are being helped by him. If that is the case, why not cut out the short rounds and go after the real enemy. Pass off the devils to us, and you take the mental cases, sin cases, etc. We will all keep very busy if we stick with the real enemy.

You, sir, will also notice, if you do a sincere browse here, that we are NOT attacking and guruizing the little people. We attack the big boys who lead many into perdition, and we DEFEND the downtrodden and comfort the weak. We give attention to giving the saints much assurance and comfort. You missed that, and I really have NO hope you will recant. You are big stuff, but not big enough to admit you lied about me, and you are an offense aginst David Cloud also.

Dear reader:
I would not have responded to this slow belly if he were not typical of the self-proclaimed bigots who attack KJV Only Bible believers. They hate us, and one day they will kill us if they can. There are many people out there like this man who twist and pervert the words and lives of you and me. We need to sometimes stand them down and call their filthy accusations what they are. I hope this page helps you get ready to slap the devil's man who comes hunting you. Keep the old KJV sword ready and sharp, and plunge it in "until the dirt came out".


Blessings on you, Doug Mallett.
I hope you learn how to tell the truth soon.

By the way, are you not the real Rambo here? You attacked in the classic Hollywood manner-- Kill and ask questions later. You never rebuked me in anything like the way you did on your web site. Big tough Rambo for Jesus-- Get your gun and come see me some time. I will put a load of buck shot where it will make a soprano of you.

You, sir, have not got Blessed Quietness Journal linked at your site. Are you trying to hide the most recent material? I suspect so. If not, how about getting updated?

I close by answering your question:

Wow, what a Rambo for Christ, the last defending one-man army for truth. Humm, could you explain one more time how it is you are disassociated from KJV-Onlyism Mr.Van Nattan?

Again, he is trying to dissociate himself from what he is, a KJV-Onlyist but Mr. Van Nattan is just too clever to fall for the devils (sic) wiles. He continues on �what better way for Satan to operate than to play on their zeal for the Word of God?�

You liar. Nowhere in my journal do I even TRY to disassociate myself from the use, defense, and promotion of the KJV as the ONLY Bible in English. You knew that, but you tried to make me sound like I was ashamed of that. Well, READ, YOU BASTARD LIAR--

Here are YOUR words:

Pride is a terrible thing and the feel good emotions that come from proclaiming to be the only one who holds the truth still appeals to the pride of man. Pride was what caused the fall and pride is still what causes the fall in individual lives. Pride leads to all manner of deviate behavior and strange beliefs. It is pride that keeps a person trapped because of the refusal to acknowledge that they just might be wrong.

Pride causes men to take another man out of context, twist his words, and make a devil of him. Why? So that YOU can rise higher. I sure hope you got a real boost in your ministry by twisting and perverting my words. If so, you can surely be proud of yourself. By being lied about, Steve Van Nattan (not the Holy Ghost) lifted up Doug Mallett. How can I complain if my sufferings for Christ should add to your glory?

Don't worry, Be happy, Dougy baby.




We wait to post the man's letter and / or drop this page after he ceases his attacks and lies against Steve and David Cloud.
We have NO interest in this becoming an ongoing joust.
We DO defend ourselves against false accusations.

No response from this hireling as of September 2005

No response from the Bastard liar as of June 2006

No restonst from the slow belly as of July 2009



This is so depressing folks. When one is attacked in debate, or when someone defends themselves, that is tolerable, even instructional. Great men like Spurgeon and Martin Lloyd Jones are classic as defenders, and they welcomed confrontation when the adversary dealt with differences. But, to be brazenly lied about in the present model is enraging. Ahmed Deedat, Islamic guru from South Africa, used this device viciously. But, to receive a libelous attack from an alleged Fundamentalist is very puzzling indeed. We do not hold back in dealing with Fundamentalists who behave wickedly if it serves the saints to mark these men. But, we try very hard NOT to lie about them.

Romans 16:17 (KJV) Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them.

Let me suggest you join me as I run for cover. I have tried to deal with this man's lies, but he will not retract them. He is, in the words of Spurgeon, "a popelet" who exalts himself to the office of accuser and judge. I am so thankful that my dear Savior and Lord is more willing to receive me in love than this fellow. If he were my lord, I would be damned to hell.

Hebrews 12:14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:
15 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;
16 Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.

When I was a kid growing up in Africa there was a missionary who was hunting on the plains. He hated hyenas for some reason. They are indeed a bother, but they clean up death, and God created them for a good reason. They will eat virtually anything. Well, this missionary saw a hyena run by as he was stalking an animal, and he decided to shoot the hyena. He only gutted the thing, and as the hyena went loping off, it would turn and eat its own entrails as they spilled from its stomach.

Lovely story, right? Sorry about that, but it reminds me of Fundamentalists. They devour one another. They NEED each other in the battle with cults, devils, the flesh, and the Whore Church. But, they are too chicken to go after these real enemies of Christ. So, these Fundamentalists mindlessly turn and devour one another.

Check it out. Ask a Fundamentalist about another Fundamental church in the area and their pastor. The response will be a close examination of the other church's standards and fine points of doctrine. Hem lines too high, too cozy with Ruckman or Tennessee Temple, and a bit too Calvinist. Now, ask them about the nearby Orthodox Presbyterian, Evangelical Anglican, or the Reformed Episcopal church. They will blast them for being liberal, which they are not. They are old line Reformed, and some defend the KJV better than the person you are talking to. This person you are talking to will not have a clue what they believe. They are too busy gathering damning evidence for the prosecution of other Fundamentalists to learn what the OPC believes.

Finally, how many Fundamental preachers do you know who have a Catholic priest friend? Hmmmmmmmm

By the way, have you heard that Jesus was seen in the home of a Pharisee named Simon having a good time and eating dinner with him? We better look into that. Also, he spent a lot of time eating and drinking with government employees and sinners. And, I hear he had a revival meeting with those cultist in Mount Gerizim over in Samaria. Do you suppose he used their counterfeit version of the Scripture........... ?


Update: July 2009:
I believe I see why Doug Mallett will never deal with his lies about me. He has on staff a divorced lady who claims to be divorced for biblical reasons. There is no such thing, as we show in our article online. So, the liar, Doug Mallett, told many lies about me, while he condones a gross violation of Christ's own teaching in the New Testament. He dodges his own compromise by a diversion tactic of calling me a "Rambo". This is good sensational strategy if you are talking about a political campaign, but we are talking here about an alleged Fundamentalist attacking a fellow Bible believer.

I challenge Dougy Mallett to show, from the King James Bible, that our article on divorce is in error.

One more interesting observation. Doug Mallett and I are about the only Bible believers on the Web who have posted very similar articles on masturbation. His attack on me shows how utterly insane some men are in trashing fellow soldiers in the battle for Truth. I gladly commend his article on masturbation.